|
For 27 days, a medium-sized company for 60 days, and the weakest micro and small companies are estimated not to survive COVID-19. Business emergency plans are urgently needed Hugo Hernández Ojeda Álvarez, expert partner in Labor Law at Hogan Lovells, stated that not all companies have policies to deal with emergencies such as COVID-19 and they react on the fly, which affects them due to the lack of necessary controls. and, more than anything, the lack of accurate and timely information that is required to act with the necessary immediacy. He indicated that implementing an emergency plan in companies is neither expensive nor time-consuming, but depends on the size of the companies, but in general terms it can be implemented in about 7 business days. “Even with Phase 2 of COVID-19 you can act, but time is reduced and you must act quickly.
He explained that the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, in coordination with the Ministry of Health, issued an Action Guide applicable to all Work Centers in Mexico, with the objective of preventing and addressing cases of COVID-19. These measures must be considered by employers in Mexico to be able to issue an emergency plan America Cell Phone Number List and carry out the corresponding actions during the health contingency decreed by the federal government. Some of the most important points of this Guide are: – Disseminate and promote COVID-19 prevention measures in workplaces Promote a healthy distance by reducing the frequency and face-to-face meetings. – Implement entry filters to identify personnel with respiratory diseases. – Send staff home when they present respiratory illnesses. – Isolate those workers with confirmed COVID-19 infection. – Identify functions that can be performed from home. – Inform employees about the National Healthy Distance Day for COVID-19. – Implement permanent cleaning measures in the work center. – Keep records of incapacitated personnel and evaluate possible cases of contagion.

These results raise a red flag for COP26 in November when the aspirations set out in the Paris Agreement will become tougher national commitments, and we can expect to see more capital flow away from those companies that do not align with a 2C pathway. With the support of more than 67 investors representing nearly $19 trillion in assets under management, TPI's work aims to help inform asset owners and managers about the actions needed to encourage high-emitting companies toward reduction efforts. more ambitious decarbonization. Research for the report was carried out by the Grantham Research Institute of Climate Change and the Environment at LSE, with data provided by FTSE Russell and funding from asset managers including Aberdeen Standard, BNP Paribas, Legal & General, Neuberger Berman and Robeco. The findings of Friday's report highlight some bright spots and improvements over the past year since the group's last major assessment in 2019. For example, it shows that European companies in carbon-intensive industries are leading their global peers in the low-carbon transition, with more than a third (36%) having set out plans to reduce their emissions in line with 2 degrees C or 1.5 degrees C of warming, as set out in the Paris Agreement. In contrast, only 16% of high-carbon companies assessed in the United States, 10% in Japan, 5% in China, and none in Russia and Africa, have done the same, according to TPI.
|
|